Google should probably add this disclaimer to Gemini: "Honestly, to be safe, just Google it." That's because Gemini, the company's AI chatbot meant to compete with ChatGPT, is prone to make stuff up, or in more technical terms, hallucinate.
— CNET
For those interested in real-world AI hallucinations, healthcare coverage for retirees turned out to be an example.
Google Gemini Error
In response to my previous post about retirement and healthcare, a friend (and reader) asked me about his COBRA coverage with his impending retirement. His HR person at his company told him he was not eligible for COBRA on retirement. Here was his message.
I was doing my exit interview, asked about a COBRA detail, and she said “Well, you’re not eligible for COBRA because you’re leaving voluntarily. COBRA is a benefit for people who are terminated.”
Then, he asked Google Gemini, and this is what it told him.
What? This answer was one I knew to be wrong, both from personal experience and from the reading of government documentation. The Department of Labor clearly calls out that a qualifying event for COBRA coverage includes “termination of the employee's employment for any reason other than gross misconduct.”
My friend went back to his HR department, armed with this data. The HR rep was NOT correct, later acknowledged the error, and apologized.
Fortunately, competing AI products did OK. (continued below…)
ChatGPT
So, my friend later tried to use ChatGPT. It turns out that ChatGPT got the correct answer.
It sounds like there may have been some confusion during your discussion with HR. COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) generally applies to employees who lose their job, but it also extends to those who lose coverage due to a "qualifying event." Retirement is considered a qualifying event under COBRA, and you should typically be eligible to continue your health coverage for up to 18 months (or longer in some cases).
If your HR rep suggested that COBRA is only available for terminations, they might be mistaken, or there could be specific nuances in your company's health plan. I'd recommend following up with HR or checking your benefits plan details. You can also contact the Department of Labor for more guidance if needed.
— ChatGPT
This got me curious, so I decided to try this in the two AI tools I normally use for research which are companions to search.
Google Search Generative AI
In this confusing world of AI tools, Google Search Generative AI is actually a different offering from Google Gemini, available directly from within Google Search.
I tried Google Search Generative AI with a similar question, and, like ChatGPT, it also produced the correct response. (I couldn’t use the exact question because my friend’s query was longer than 32 words, the current limit of Google Search.)
Microsoft CoPilot
I also tried my friend’s query in Microsoft CoPilot.
Microsoft CoPilot also produced the right answer.
Conclusion
At a personal level, I’ve had a decent experience with AI tools when researching topics. This hallucination by Google Gemini seems consistent with reviews like the one quoted in CNET above.
For now, I continue to do fact-checking via source materials and remain appreciative that search AI tools often try to cite sources. Even when their answers are correct, the source materials these generative AI companions to search often cite often do not contain the actual correct information that is described by the generative AI summaries. So, there’s often still more digging to do, so for now, I agree with the disclaimer “Honestly, to be safe, just Google it.”
I just voluntarily left my job at a tech company this past week and was offered COBRA. I didn’t label it as “retirement” because there’s no retirement benefits anyway. I’ve never heard of someone leaving a company voluntarily and not being offered COBRA.
Very interesting. And yes, HR people make mistakes for sure. And even companies make mistakes in their employee handbooks. I decided to check our AI tool at Meta. Happily it got it right. And I learned something - I did not know that dependents losing coverage due to aging out are also eligible. Here's what Meta.ai reported when I shared the prompt:
COBRA (Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) eligibility is not based on whether an employee leaves voluntarily or is terminated. Instead, it's primarily based on the following:
The employer has 20 or more employees.
The employee was covered by the employer's group health plan.
The employee experienced a qualifying event, which includes:
Voluntary resignation (quitting)
Termination (fired or laid off)
Reduced work hours
Divorce or separation from the covered employee
Dependent child reaching adulthood
If these conditions are met, the employee and their dependents are generally eligible for COBRA continuation coverage.
Under COBRA, employees who leave voluntarily are entitled to continue their employer-sponsored health insurance for up to 18 months (or 36 months for dependents in some cases).
It's recommended that you:
Review your company's COBRA policy.
Consult HR or benefits administration.
Contact the Department of Labor or a relevant state agency for guidance.
You may want to clarify this information with your former employer or HR representative.